It is said in the old proverb 'Forewarned is forearmed' and the following article and my experience will I hope prove to be a forewarning to the unwary.
Two new threats to all who value liberty and particularly bodily autonomy are emerging.
First, from the WHO and their globalist allies which have been announcing a second so called pandemic for years. The WHO has just declared MonkeyPox a (PHEIC) Public Health Emergency of International Concern, with claims of extreme death rates. Meanwhile the WHO is being restructured to be the exclusive worldwide authority to impose masks, lockdowns, quarantine, injections and censorship in all its member states, which includes the UK.
Second is the sinister move by the EU which is set to pioneer the development of digital “vaccine passports”, and will next month launch a test run of its new EVC (European Vaccine Certificate) in five countries – Belgium. Germany, Greece, Latvia and Portugal.
Whilst the UK is not in the EU it is almost certain that our new Labour government would endorse this move should it be developed further. What many of us strongly suspect is that any EVC is a stepping stone for mandatory vaccinations in the future, and equally sinister, a means of restricting free movements of people across continents, and particularly of concern for air travellers and holiday makers via cheap flights.
Dr. David Bell, former WHO programme Head, has written a timely comment on the M'Pox - entitled 'The M'Pox Emergency – What is Really Happening?
“As the Covid-19 playbook showed, this is about money and power on a scale only matched by similar fascist regimes of the past. Current efforts across Western countries to denigrate the concept of free speech, to criminalize dissent, and to institute health passports to control movement are not new and are in no way disconnected from the inevitability of the WHO declaring the Mpox PHEIC. We are not in the world we knew twenty years ago.”
Sorry to trouble you with further depressing news that may prepare us for opposition to these developments well in advance, and to learn from my own unfortunate experience as follows:
I had read over the past three years most of the excellent articles on TCW For Freedom by deeply concerned and highly qualified professional medics who were alarmed by the government and NHS covering up the agenda behind the 'vaccine' saga. I was particularly impressed by the findings of Dr. Angus Dalgleish and of growing reports of 'alarming ingredients in the vaccinations' revealed by undertakers, particularly John O'looney among others. Many of us are I'm sure fully aware of these disturbing aspects already
I was personally un-vaxxed, but like many others in the UK I had received several invitations via phone calls and letters from my local clinic to partake of the Covid 19 jab which I declined. Also, members of my family had received the jab, on the whole without adverse effects and which prompted my curiosity to find out more from the NHS direct. That was in October 2023, and being in my very late eighties wondered whether I should really bother at my age!
I then submitted an FOI question to a Dr. Nikita Kanani, then Deputy Head of NHS Vaccination Services from whom I and thousands of others in the UK had received several invitations for the jab. It was a measure of my naivete that I thought an FOI question would establish the truth as to what the jabs were all about.
I submitted my three-part question, in writing to this lady and received confirmation it had been received. Not much new about that as many others will doubtless have asked questions of the NHS. Here is what I requested, in summary.
First, for the vaccinations to be lawful are they:
Experimental or tested and subject to the usual human and animal testing period of 8- 10 years before being approved and released for public health purposes? Are the short- and long-term effects known?
Will the vaccinations be subject to the legal requirement of informed consent prior to application? Would they be via Moderna, Pfizer, or Astra Zeneca, and mRNA varieties which are known to attack the immune systems of recipients? Suffice to say I received no reply within the statutory obligatory 21-day time period and so pursued the matter via the Information Commissioner over a period of eight months but without success.
I finally received an NHS reply in June 2024 which left me mentally gobsmacked and reeling. I really could not believe it was a serious response. Their statement simply read:
“We …... can confirm we do not hold information in scope of your request.”
It may help if we also explain that the FOI Act applies to recorded information held by a public authority at the time of the request. We are not obliged to create new information under the law and do not generate new information to answer request considered under this legislation”
My first reaction was to mentally question whether other people had received the same reply to similar enquiries but I don't know. I had optimistically anticipated not much more than a 'low information' reply – but “no information”? Really?
Such enquiries of the NHS are not only obviously legitimate but entirely necessary given their much proclaimed “safe and effective” trotted out ad nauseam, but never proved as the ever-increasing evidence is that extremely harmful adverse effects and deaths from the 'vaccine' is so well established beyond doubt.
But many other important questions arise which have yet to be answered in relation to the astonishing “No information” claim.
First. It implies that the content of the vaccine could comprise almost anything, and clearly an impossibly absurd position.
Second. Some information must be assumed to justify the “safe and effective “claim.
Third. How can any semblance of informed consent be offered or agreed if the vaccine is lacking published data concerning content? That would be an open admission of illegality in the whole programme under the terms of both the Nuremberg Code and the UK Supreme Court judgment ruling of 2015 about consent. (The Montgomery Judgment) In this context I pondered the equally bizarre situation where potentially thousands of boxes sent to NHS jab centres by Big Pharma nationwide were somehow without vital information. Were these marked: 'COVID 19 VACCINES PHIALS. CONTENT UNKNOWN (MAY CONTAIN SUBSTANCES)?
The IC stated that the required information “may be obtained by request to the MHRA”, but then it must be asked if this was already in the public domain why did the NHS simply not quote such MHRA data and information in their reply to me?
It may be asked whether all this is now somewhat academic as such a vast volume of information about the Covid 19 vaccine have now entered public knowledge, albeit painfully slowly, through much research by dedicated professional medics the world over.
But the quest for vaccine truth must be relentlessly pursued, not only because tax-funded public health bodies such as the NHS, including UK Health Ministers, must be made accountable for their policies, but also for the almost certain return of bogus 'pandemics' such as the 'Monkeypox' requiring equally dangerous experimental vaccines in the future.
The three requests in my FOI question are basic and fundamental and we need to insist that the NHS and any other UK medical agencies answer them prior to any renewed 'jabs' programme being unleashed on a still largely unprepared public many of whom still cling to the bogus and lying “safe and effective” mantra so glibly trotted out by government and the medical establishment.
Not unexpectedly, I still have not received an answer from the NHS to my FOI question.